字級大小:
  • 小
  • 中
  • 大
  • 粉紅版
  • 藍色版
  • 綠色版

簡易/進階查詢

查詢範圍:
  • 所有來源
  • dtd_國際教育訊息
  • dtd_圖書全文
  • dtd_研討會論文
  • dtd_期刊論文
  • dtd_研究計畫及報告
現在位置首頁 > 詳目
doImage
  • 放大
  • 下載
  • 下載
期刊論文
刊名教育研究與發展期刊
專輯名稱教育心理,輔導與測評
卷期13:4
篇名量表長度簡化研究:「簡式中小學教師主觀幸福感量表」修訂
其他題名並列題名;Study of Scale-Items Reduction: The Reconstruction of Subjective Well-Being Scale
起訖頁27-56
作者余民寧;陳柏霖;陳玉樺
出版/發行者國家教育研究院
出版中心教育資源及出版中心
出版年月2017/12
出版地新北市
出版國別臺灣
語文中文
ISSN18166504
關鍵字詞主觀幸福感短題本試題反應理論subjective well-beingshort form versionitem response theory
章節標目摘要(頁27-28);壹、緒論(頁29-30);貳、文獻探討(頁30-34);參、研究方法(頁34-37);肆、結果與討論(頁37-48);伍、結論與建議(頁48-51);謝誌(頁51);參考文獻(頁52-56)
摘要本研究旨在發展一份適合華人使用,經濟、有效之評估主觀幸福感之工具。本研究將過去所編制之「主觀幸福感量表」修訂為「簡式中小學教師主觀幸福感量表」,以符合臨床應用與實務研究上之經濟性與效率性的需求。依據全國各縣市學校數比率進行抽樣後,共得有效選題樣本1,046人,在原量表情緒幸福感、心理幸福感與社會幸福感三向度的架構下,根據評定量尺模式與試題差異功能分析結果,選出15題的「簡式中小學教師主觀幸福感量表」。然後,重新以分層隨機抽樣取得1,180名中小學教師為有效樣本,執行主觀幸福感驗證性因素分析(CFA),發現整體模式具備相當不錯之適配度。本研究發現:以「臺灣憂鬱情緒量表」作為外在效標,進行效標關聯效度分析,發現心理、社會、情緒幸福感與憂鬱變項間,均有顯著負相關,顯示本簡式量表具有不錯的外在效標關聯效度。針對上述研究結果並提出相關建議,以供未來研究與實務工作者之參考。
摘要(英文): The multidimensional Subjective Well-being Scale (SWS) had become one of the most widely-used inventories for measuring the subjective well-being construct including psychological well-being, social well-being, and emotional well-being. For economic effi ciency and widespread use, we developed a short form of the Subjective Well-being Scale, the SWS-SF. There were two sets of sample: development sample and validation sample, in which 1,046 and 1,180 teachers randomly selected according to the ratio of the number of schools from cities around Taiwan. Through two-stage process of item selection and model confirmation, the 39-item full scale was reduced to 15-item brief version. The items in the brief version of Subjective Well-being Scale were selected according to the rating scale model (RSM) and differential item functioning (DIF) of item response theory. The structure of the brief version was tested by the confirmation factor analysis (CFA). Results show that: The processes of parameter estimation, item selection, cross-validation, and comparisons with the full scale and other construct (Taiwan Depression Scale) are presented and discussed. The results show that the three-factor model performed adequate goodness-of-fit in brief version, and the psychological, social, and emotional well-beings all had significantly negative relationships with depression. This indicates that the factor structure of the brief version of Subjective Well-being Scale was the same as the full scale and also there was a good criterion-related validity in teachers’ subjective well-being model. Finally, some suggestions for practice usage and future research are proposed.
授權狀態已授權