No matter High School Multiple Entrance Program (HSMEP) or College Multiple Entrance Program (CMEP), the main purpose of them was to reduce strong academic pressure because of "one examination set one up for life." While the two programs mentioned above reformed in the right direction, and brought part of benefits, but also generated a lot of disputes, how to improve them in the future is worth exploring. Therefore, the main purpose of the study is to explore benefits, disputes and strategies of HSMEP and CMEP. This research was conducted over one-year period using depthinterview methodology. The interviewees included six experts from northern, central, and southern areas of Taiwan. The reform suggestions for HSMEP are: simplification and flexibility of the admission system, priority to granting disadvantaged high schools according to the report of high school evaluation performance, and long-term planning to balance high school distribution and bridge the regional gaps. The reform suggestions for CMEP are: simplification and flexibility of the admission system, guiding the universities to reduce the interviews and offer them interview notice references, encouraging top universities to set up individual student portfolios as one of the entry requirements, leading all universities to increase the proportion of Star Plan students and improving the plan for the disadvantaged students.
