| 英文摘要 | Textbooks are important media that play crucial roles in students’ learning experience. Hence, it is essential to enhance and diversify the content design of textbooks to ensure that textbooks not only conform to the basic requirements of the curriculum but demonstrate the creativity and unique inputs of their editors and publishers, who make particular designs to meet the needs of differentiated instruction, self-learning, and the education in the future. Based on the fundamental concepts of textbook evaluation and recommendation system, this study aims to establish a set of self-evaluation criteria that can serve as an essential reference in textbook publishers’ self-evaluation reports. This study aims to produce a draft of self-evaluation criteria through file analyses and semi-structured interviews in the first year. The goal in the second year is to revise and finalize the criteria after holding Focus Group Expert Forums and conducting a survey using the modified Delphi technique. The completed criteria include “R&D process,” “content editing,” “editing operation,” “digital embedding,” and “trial and evaluation”; 14 items then follow these 5 aspects. The self-evaluation criteria proposed in this study should be revised regularly to advance with the times. Textbook publishers can use this set of self-evaluation criteria to improve the operation of their editing processes or use it as a reference when writing their editing reports. The government and private institutions should cooperate to establish a set of textbook evaluation and recommendation standards that can be accepted by both. |
